home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: philw.users.xplor.com!user
- From: philw@xplor.com (P A Williamson)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: New Press Release!
- Date: 11 Mar 1996 03:40:17 GMT
- Organization: Redland Sky Toys
- Message-ID: <philw-1003961936590001@philw.users.xplor.com>
- References: <19960308.7B72580.ED85@shadow.res.cmu.edu> <Do0JwK.6Eo@info.uucp> <4hsn6s$luc@uwm.edu> <4hv2oo$1s0@nyx.cs.du.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: philw.users.xplor.com
-
- In article <4hv2oo$1s0@nyx.cs.du.edu>, kathomas@nyx.cs.du.edu (Karl
- Thomas) wrote:
-
- > Whose fault is it that they are trying to run PhotoShop without enough
- > RAM? Does anything like Netscape exists on the Amiga that you can
- > compare it with? It never ceases to amaze me how Amiga users flame Macs
- > about slow bloated apps by comparing it to low-end Amiga crap. If you
- > want to talk about slow try putting that Amiga into a non-interlaced
- > non-flickering graphics mode and see how it compares.
-
- I have absolutly no problem with putting my Amiga in a non-interlaced,
- non-flickering display. It moves graphics around as fast as my Performa
- (040 system vs. 040 system). All I did was put a graphics card inside.
- Actually, my Performa is no jack rabbit in the graphics dept. :-)
-